-
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2015
- July 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- May 2014
- January 2014
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- September 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
Categories
- Advertising Injury
- Allocation of Defence Costs
- Appeals
- Auto
- Auto (Tort)
- CGL
- Collateral Benefits
- Commercial Litigation
- Conflict of Laws
- Contract
- Costs
- Damages
- Defamation
- Discoverability
- Discovery
- Duty to Defend
- Environmental
- Evidence
- Exclusions
- Experts and Opinions
- Fire Insurance
- Fires
- FLA
- Insurance News
- Juries
- Lawyers
- Limitation Periods
- Litigation Technology
- Municipalities
- Occupier's Liability
- Pleadings
- Practice and Procedure
- Practice of Law
- Privacy
- Privilege
- Products Liability
- Professional Liability
- Risk Transfer
- Sale of Goods
- Social and Commercial Host Liability
- Subrogation
- Threshold
- Tort News
- Trial Procedure
- Uncategorized
- Uninsured or Underinsured
- Waivers and releases
Meta
Category Archives: Insurance News
C.A. Finds Lessee of Vehicle Insured by Leasing Company’s Umbrella Policy
This afternoon, the Court of Appeal released its decision in Avis Rent-A-Car System Inc. v. Certas Direct Insurance Company. The ruling is an important one for car rental companies and their insurers. The Court held that a renter of a car … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News
Comments Off on C.A. Finds Lessee of Vehicle Insured by Leasing Company’s Umbrella Policy
C.A. Says Excess Insurer Not Liable for Defence Costs
Last week, the Court of Appeal released a decision that addressed a recurring issue: “when will an excess insurer be required to contribute to defence costs incurred by a primary insurer in defending an action against a common insured?” It … Continue reading
Posted in Allocation of Defence Costs, Duty to Defend, Insurance News
Comments Off on C.A. Says Excess Insurer Not Liable for Defence Costs
Back Injury Pierces Threshold
Lahay v. Henderson arose out of an MVA which left the plaintiff with soft tissue injuries, principally to his back. Liability was admitted. The trial judge ruled that the plaintiff, a manual labourer before the accident, would never be able … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News, Threshold
Comments Off on Back Injury Pierces Threshold
Mistake as to Seriousness of Injury Does Not Extend Limitation Period
The “discoverability” principle does not permit a limitation period to be extended where a plaintiff delays suing because she does not, at first, realize the seriousness of her injury. This is what the Divisional Court ruled in Smith v. Toronto.In … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Discoverability, Insurance News, Limitation Periods, Threshold
Comments Off on Mistake as to Seriousness of Injury Does Not Extend Limitation Period
Two Significant C.A. Personal Injury Decisions
Two decisions of importance to the personal injury bar and the insurance industry were released by the Court of Appeal this afternoon. They are Vollick v. Sheard and Walker v. Ritchie. Both cases involved the issue of whether an owner … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News, Threshold
Comments Off on Two Significant C.A. Personal Injury Decisions
C.A. Says Father and Daugher Were “Co-owners” of Car
In Mazur v. Elias, the Court of Appeal has endorsed the notion of “co-ownership” of automobiles. The case involves the often-seen fact pattern of a car being purchased by one person but licensed and insured in the name of another. … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News
Comments Off on C.A. Says Father and Daugher Were “Co-owners” of Car
Court Says Repair Costs Like Environmental Cleanup — CGL Must Pay
We are happy to report that The Canadian Legal LEXPERT Directory for 2005 lists Steve Cavanagh as a “Leading Practitioner” in “Civil Litigation—Commercial Insurance”, one of only five lawyers in eastern Ontario to be so recognized. Congratulations also to the … Continue reading
Posted in CGL, Environmental, Insurance News
Comments Off on Court Says Repair Costs Like Environmental Cleanup — CGL Must Pay
Court Allocates Defence Costs in Sexual Abuse Case
In finding that an insurer has a duty to defend a sexual abuse claim, a Superior Court judge took the unusual extra step of allocating defence costs: 20% payable by the insurer and the 80% by the insured. The case … Continue reading
Posted in Allocation of Defence Costs, Duty to Defend, Insurance News
Comments Off on Court Allocates Defence Costs in Sexual Abuse Case
Threshold Decision Favours Plaintiff But Jury Sees Case Differently
Regular readers of our Updates know that just when insurance defence lawyers and their clients were beginning to despair of ever winning a threshold motion, a series of decisions were handed down that favoured the defence. But a Superior Court … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Collateral Benefits, Insurance News, Threshold
Comments Off on Threshold Decision Favours Plaintiff But Jury Sees Case Differently
C.A. Says That Relief From Forfeiture Not Usually Available for Pre-loss Conduct
In the space of a week, two appellate decisions have dealt with relief from forfeiture. First, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its ruling in Marche v. Halifax Insurance (about which we sent an Update last week). Today, the Court … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News
Comments Off on C.A. Says That Relief From Forfeiture Not Usually Available for Pre-loss Conduct