-
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2015
- July 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- May 2014
- January 2014
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- September 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
Categories
- Advertising Injury
- Allocation of Defence Costs
- Appeals
- Auto
- Auto (Tort)
- CGL
- Collateral Benefits
- Commercial Litigation
- Conflict of Laws
- Contract
- Costs
- Damages
- Defamation
- Discoverability
- Discovery
- Duty to Defend
- Environmental
- Evidence
- Exclusions
- Experts and Opinions
- Fire Insurance
- Fires
- FLA
- Insurance News
- Juries
- Lawyers
- Limitation Periods
- Litigation Technology
- Municipalities
- Occupier's Liability
- Pleadings
- Practice and Procedure
- Practice of Law
- Privacy
- Privilege
- Products Liability
- Professional Liability
- Risk Transfer
- Sale of Goods
- Social and Commercial Host Liability
- Subrogation
- Threshold
- Tort News
- Trial Procedure
- Uncategorized
- Uninsured or Underinsured
- Waivers and releases
Meta
Category Archives: Insurance News
Not “Quantum of Solace” But “Quantum of Claims”
In McCook v. Subramaniam, Master Ronald Dash considered whether to permit a plaintiff to add as a defendant his own auto insurer, under its underinsured motorist endorsement. The insurer resisted the motion on the basis that the plaintiff had not … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News, Uninsured or Underinsured
Comments Off on Not “Quantum of Solace” But “Quantum of Claims”
Income Replacement Benefits Subject to Garnishment
Mr. Justice John Cavarzan has held, in Lease Truck Inc. v. Serbinek, that a creditor of an insured is entitled to garnishment of income replacement benefits. Once it receives notice of the garnishment, the insurer paying the accident benefits is … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News
Comments Off on Income Replacement Benefits Subject to Garnishment
Insurer Added as Third Party Under Insurance Act Permitted to Examine Insured for Discovery
Corrigendum: Our reference to the Master’s consideration of an Alberta case, Thompson v. McCallum, erroneously contained the following passage: “The insurer suspected that the insured had, in fact, been the driver.” The sentence should read, “The insurer suspected that the plaintiff … Continue reading
Posted in Insurance News
Comments Off on Insurer Added as Third Party Under Insurance Act Permitted to Examine Insured for Discovery
Owner “Relinquished Dominion and Control” of Car, But Her Consent to Possession by Driver Still Necessary?
In Seegmiller v. Langer, Justice George R. Strathy reviewed the law with respect to when the owner of an automobile will be liable when someone else drives it and is involved in an accident. His reasons contain a useful review … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News
Comments Off on Owner “Relinquished Dominion and Control” of Car, But Her Consent to Possession by Driver Still Necessary?
Limitation Period for MVA Pecuniary Claims Follows That of Non-pecuniary Claims, Says Superior Court
Hard on the heels of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Grewal v. Ivany, released last Friday, Mr. Justice Paul Perell has delivered reasons in Ng v. Beline that address one of the issues considered in Grewal: in personal injury … Continue reading
Posted in Discoverability, Limitation Periods, Threshold
Comments Off on Limitation Period for MVA Pecuniary Claims Follows That of Non-pecuniary Claims, Says Superior Court
C.A. Opens Door to Multiple Limitation Periods in MVA Cases
[Addendum: Since this decision was released and our commentary posted, Mr. Justice Paul Perell has released reasons in Ng v. Beline that deal directly with the issue discussed in this post. It appears that neither the Court of Appeal nor … Continue reading
Posted in Discoverability, Limitation Periods, Threshold
Comments Off on C.A. Opens Door to Multiple Limitation Periods in MVA Cases
Subrogation by Landlord’s Insurer Permitted Despite Tenant’s Rent Being Applied to Landlord’s Insurance Premiums
1044589 Ontario Inc. (Nantucket Business Centre) dealt with the frequently-litigated issue of the right of a landlord’s insurer to advance a subrogated claim against a tenant. Here, Madam Justice Ruth E. Mesbur held that the landlord’s insurer was entitled to … Continue reading
Posted in Fire Insurance, Insurance News, Subrogation
Comments Off on Subrogation by Landlord’s Insurer Permitted Despite Tenant’s Rent Being Applied to Landlord’s Insurance Premiums
Judge Says Plaintiff Not Required to Pursue Claim Against Tortfeasor As Condition of Accessing Uninsured Motorist Coverage
[Addendum: This decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal on August 21, 2009.] Ontario auto insurers might be surprised to learn that the Insurance Act and the standard auto policy do not require persons claiming against the uninsured motorist coverage to pursue anyone whose negligence … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News, Uninsured or Underinsured
Comments Off on Judge Says Plaintiff Not Required to Pursue Claim Against Tortfeasor As Condition of Accessing Uninsured Motorist Coverage
C.A. Adopts Broad Interpretation of “Subcontractor” in CGL “Your Work” Exclusion
This afternoon, the Court of Appeal released its decision in AXA Insurance v. Ani-Wall Concrete Forming. (We previously commented here on the decision of Perell J. from which the appeal was taken.) The issue in the case was whether Ani-Wall … Continue reading
Posted in CGL, Exclusions, Insurance News
Comments Off on C.A. Adopts Broad Interpretation of “Subcontractor” in CGL “Your Work” Exclusion
First Bill 198 Decision Says Not Much Has Changed
Nissan v. McNamee is, so far as we know, the first decision to interpret the “gloss” on the Insurance Act threshold that was enacted by regulation O.Reg. 381/03 (the package of legislative changes commonly referred to as “Bill 198”). The regulation took effect on … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News, Threshold
Comments Off on First Bill 198 Decision Says Not Much Has Changed