-
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2015
- July 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- May 2014
- January 2014
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- September 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
Categories
- Advertising Injury
- Allocation of Defence Costs
- Appeals
- Auto
- Auto (Tort)
- CGL
- Collateral Benefits
- Commercial Litigation
- Conflict of Laws
- Contract
- Costs
- Damages
- Defamation
- Discoverability
- Discovery
- Duty to Defend
- Environmental
- Evidence
- Exclusions
- Experts and Opinions
- Fire Insurance
- Fires
- FLA
- Insurance News
- Juries
- Lawyers
- Limitation Periods
- Litigation Technology
- Municipalities
- Occupier's Liability
- Pleadings
- Practice and Procedure
- Practice of Law
- Privacy
- Privilege
- Products Liability
- Professional Liability
- Risk Transfer
- Sale of Goods
- Social and Commercial Host Liability
- Subrogation
- Threshold
- Tort News
- Trial Procedure
- Uncategorized
- Uninsured or Underinsured
- Waivers and releases
Meta
Category Archives: Privilege
Important Ruling on Litigation Privilege
In what appears to have been a longstanding battle between Coseco Insurance Company and one of its insureds, Mr. Justice John Macdonald has released an important decision on the issue of litigation privilege. He dismissed the insurer’s appeal from a master’s … Continue reading
Posted in Discovery, Insurance News, Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on Important Ruling on Litigation Privilege
Court Holds That Defendant Entitled to See Complete Copies of Affidavits Filed on Motion for Court Approval of Settlement
Burns Estate v. Falloon addressed an issue that was raised at the recent Montebello Civil Litigation conference: on a motion for approval of the settlement of a claim by a person under a disability, is the defence entitled to be served with unexpurgated … Continue reading
Posted in Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on Court Holds That Defendant Entitled to See Complete Copies of Affidavits Filed on Motion for Court Approval of Settlement
Master Says Communications with Paralegal Are Privileged (in this case, at least)
In what is apparently the first case to consider the issue, Master R. Dash has held that communications passing between a paralegal and his client were privileged from production in a civil action. The case is an interesting one, partly … Continue reading
Posted in Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on Master Says Communications with Paralegal Are Privileged (in this case, at least)
Privilege Waived on Expert’s Report After It Was Reviewed by Second Expert
UPDATE: We have learned that the plaintiffs have sought leave to appeal Justice Power’s decision. We will report the outcome of that motion, which is to be heard on July 20, 2007. It is our understanding that the main (although not the … Continue reading
Posted in Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on Privilege Waived on Expert’s Report After It Was Reviewed by Second Expert
Master Orders Insurer to Produce Its Schedule B Documents
Back in January, we posted a commentary about the Divisional Court’s decision in Smith v. London Life. The case dealt with production of an insurer’s file in a first party claim that was based on allegations of bad faith on … Continue reading
Posted in Discovery, Insurance News, Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on Master Orders Insurer to Produce Its Schedule B Documents
Judge Finds No Solicitor-Client Privilege Where Communication in Furtherance of a Tort
It is well-established that solicitor-client privilege will be lost where the communication between lawyer and client is in furtherance of a crime. In Dublin v. Montessori Jewish Day School of Toronto, Mr. Justice Paul Perell ruled that the same result follows … Continue reading
Posted in Discovery, Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on Judge Finds No Solicitor-Client Privilege Where Communication in Furtherance of a Tort
Divisional Court Overturns Order Requiring Production of Insurer’s In-house Lawyer’s File
In Smith v. London Life Insurance Company, the Divisional Court reversed an order made by Superior Court Justice Gordon Thomson, who had directed the defendant London Life to produce “its entire claims file arising from a prior action between the parties, including … Continue reading
Posted in Discovery, Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on Divisional Court Overturns Order Requiring Production of Insurer’s In-house Lawyer’s File
Third Party Action Against Plaintiff’s Expert Dismissed on Basis of No Duty of Care and “Witness Immunity”
In an interesting decision, just released, Mr. Justice De Lotbinière Panet dismissed a third party claim brought by a defendant against an engineering firm which had provided a report to the plaintiff. Vie Holdings Inc. v. Imperial Oil Limited was … Continue reading
Posted in Commercial Litigation, Evidence, Privilege, Trial Procedure
Comments Off on Third Party Action Against Plaintiff’s Expert Dismissed on Basis of No Duty of Care and “Witness Immunity”
C.A. Reverses Colleague, Holds that Counsel’s Memorandum of Discussion with Expert Not Producible
A three-member panel of the Court of Appeal today reversed a July decision of a single judge of that court. The earlier decision of Gillese J.A. was the subject of a previous posting in our blawg (“C.A. Takes Expansive View … Continue reading
Posted in Discovery, Evidence, Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on C.A. Reverses Colleague, Holds that Counsel’s Memorandum of Discussion with Expert Not Producible
C.A. Takes Expansive View of Expert’s Producible “Findings, Opinions and Conclusions”
UPDATE: This decision was reversed by a 3-member panel of the Court of Appeal on September 20, 2006. See our post. Justice Gillese of the Ontario Court of Appeal yesterday released a ruling that will be of importance to all civil … Continue reading
Posted in Discovery, Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on C.A. Takes Expansive View of Expert’s Producible “Findings, Opinions and Conclusions”