-
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2015
- July 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- May 2014
- January 2014
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- September 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
Categories
- Advertising Injury
- Allocation of Defence Costs
- Appeals
- Auto
- Auto (Tort)
- CGL
- Collateral Benefits
- Commercial Litigation
- Conflict of Laws
- Contract
- Costs
- Damages
- Defamation
- Discoverability
- Discovery
- Duty to Defend
- Environmental
- Evidence
- Exclusions
- Experts and Opinions
- Fire Insurance
- Fires
- FLA
- Insurance News
- Juries
- Lawyers
- Limitation Periods
- Litigation Technology
- Municipalities
- Occupier's Liability
- Pleadings
- Practice and Procedure
- Practice of Law
- Privacy
- Privilege
- Products Liability
- Professional Liability
- Risk Transfer
- Sale of Goods
- Social and Commercial Host Liability
- Subrogation
- Threshold
- Tort News
- Trial Procedure
- Uncategorized
- Uninsured or Underinsured
- Waivers and releases
Meta
Category Archives: Damages
C.A. Finds that Award for Loss of Competitive Advantage Does Not Attract Prejudgment Interest
In our February 2, 2007 post about Cerilli v. City of Ottawa, we noted that the trial judge had awarded prejudgment interest on damages for loss of competitive advantage. We noted that in at least one other case, the trial … Continue reading
Posted in Damages, Practice and Procedure
Comments Off on C.A. Finds that Award for Loss of Competitive Advantage Does Not Attract Prejudgment Interest
Judge Says, “Plaintiff’s Evidence Is Not Credible” But Awards $400,000 for Loss of Competitive Advantage
In a decision that will alarm insurance companies, Mr. Justice Bernard Manton has awarded damages of $400,000 for loss of competitive advantage to a plaintiff who was injured in an accident at a Home Depot store. This award is more than … Continue reading
Posted in Damages, Insurance News
Comments Off on Judge Says, “Plaintiff’s Evidence Is Not Credible” But Awards $400,000 for Loss of Competitive Advantage
Death Benefits Not Deductible from Tort Damages
In brief supplementary reasons, given in Wright v. Hannon (the original reasons for judgment can be accessed here), Mr. Justice Randall S. Echlin held (or perhaps “confirmed” would be a better word), that statutory accident death benefits are properly characterized as … Continue reading
Posted in Collateral Benefits
Comments Off on Death Benefits Not Deductible from Tort Damages
ODSP Benefits Not Deductible from MVA Damages
In Moss v. Hutchinson & Associates, Mr. Justice Peter Howden has ruled that benefits received by a plaintiff from the Ontario Disability Support Program (“ODSP”) are not deductible from an award of tort damages. The action arose out of a … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Collateral Benefits, Damages, Insurance News
Comments Off on ODSP Benefits Not Deductible from MVA Damages
$400,000 in Interest Payable on 10 Years’ of Accident Benefits Improperly Terminated in 1997 (but Plaintiff had Fully Recovered by 1998!)
A new decision of the Ontario Superior Court is a painful reminder to auto insurers of the importance of following the correct procedure in terminating statutory accident benefits. The failure of the insurer to use the correct form of notice … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Collateral Benefits, Insurance News
Comments Off on $400,000 in Interest Payable on 10 Years’ of Accident Benefits Improperly Terminated in 1997 (but Plaintiff had Fully Recovered by 1998!)
Plaintiff Not Catastrophically Injured Where Two GCS Readings Below 10/15 in First 30 Minutes after Accident
UPDATE: this decision was reversed by the Court of Appeal on July 17, 2009. The reasons of the Court may be accessed here. The panel agreed that, the plaintiff having had a Glasgow Coma Scale reading of 9/15 within a … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Damages, Insurance News
Comments Off on Plaintiff Not Catastrophically Injured Where Two GCS Readings Below 10/15 in First 30 Minutes after Accident
Thorburn J. Discusses What’s Required for Court Approval of Settlements
In Rivera v. Leblond, Madam Justice Julie Ann Thorburn was asked to approve the settlement of the claim of a cyclist who had suffered a serious head injury when struck from behind by an automobile. In the course of her … Continue reading
Posted in Damages, Evidence, Insurance News, Practice and Procedure
Comments Off on Thorburn J. Discusses What’s Required for Court Approval of Settlements
SCOTUS Overturns Punitive Damages Award in Tobacco Case
The Supreme Court of the United States has overturned a $79.5 million punitive damages award made by an Oregon jury against cigarette manufacturer Philip Morris USA. In Philip Morris USA v. Williams, the widow of a heavy smoker named Jesse … Continue reading
Posted in Damages
Comments Off on SCOTUS Overturns Punitive Damages Award in Tobacco Case
Court Accepts Expert Testimony, Reduces Rule 53.09 Discount Rates for Future Health Care Expenses
In Gordon v. Greig, Justice Bruce A. Glass has assessed damages arising out of catastrophic injuries to two young men who were involved in the same motor vehicle accident. Both were awarded general non-pecuniary damages of $310,000, the maximum available … Continue reading
Posted in Damages, Evidence, Trial Procedure
Comments Off on Court Accepts Expert Testimony, Reduces Rule 53.09 Discount Rates for Future Health Care Expenses
PJI Payable on Damages for Loss of Competitive Advantage?
Last month, Justice Colin McKinnon gave judgment for the plaintiff against the City of Ottawa in a slip-and-fall case: Cerilli v. Ottawa (City). (Justice McKinnon probably did not endear himself to the city fathers (and mothers) with the opening words … Continue reading
Posted in Damages
Comments Off on PJI Payable on Damages for Loss of Competitive Advantage?