-
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2015
- July 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- May 2014
- January 2014
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- September 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- October 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
Categories
- Advertising Injury
- Allocation of Defence Costs
- Appeals
- Auto
- Auto (Tort)
- CGL
- Collateral Benefits
- Commercial Litigation
- Conflict of Laws
- Contract
- Costs
- Damages
- Defamation
- Discoverability
- Discovery
- Duty to Defend
- Environmental
- Evidence
- Exclusions
- Experts and Opinions
- Fire Insurance
- Fires
- FLA
- Insurance News
- Juries
- Lawyers
- Limitation Periods
- Litigation Technology
- Municipalities
- Occupier's Liability
- Pleadings
- Practice and Procedure
- Practice of Law
- Privacy
- Privilege
- Products Liability
- Professional Liability
- Risk Transfer
- Sale of Goods
- Social and Commercial Host Liability
- Subrogation
- Threshold
- Tort News
- Trial Procedure
- Uncategorized
- Uninsured or Underinsured
- Waivers and releases
Meta
Monthly Archives: May 2006
Court Refuses to Bifurcate MVA Trial
Although he expressed concern about “the somewhat rigid state of the existing jurisprudence”, Justice Denis Power refused to bifurcate the trial of a motor vehicle accident case. In Aghsani v. Briglio, the plaintiff was a pedestrian who had been … Continue reading
Posted in Practice and Procedure
Comments Off on Court Refuses to Bifurcate MVA Trial
C.A. Upholds Punitive Damages Award in Fire Insurance Case, but Reduces Aggravated Damages
The Court of Appeal today released its decision in Plester v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, a lawsuit that involved a disputed claim on a policy of fire insurance. Two of the insureds (a married couple) owned a furniture store and … Continue reading
Posted in Fire Insurance, Insurance News, Uninsured or Underinsured
Comments Off on C.A. Upholds Punitive Damages Award in Fire Insurance Case, but Reduces Aggravated Damages
Partial Indemnity Costs Can Equal 100% of Actual Fees
Last week’s decision of Mr. Justice David Corbett in a family law case is actually an important one for counsel acting for insurance companies. In Mantella v. Mantella, a husband and wife were involved in bitter matrimonial litigation. As seems to … Continue reading
Posted in Costs, Insurance News
Comments Off on Partial Indemnity Costs Can Equal 100% of Actual Fees
One Defendant Not Liable to Pay Defaulting Defendant’s Settlement Contribution
In Budning v. Vinokurov et al., the plaintiff settled with three defendants. Minutes of settlement were entered into, specifying the amounts to be paid by each defendant. Two of the defendants (a law firm and a municipality) paid their contributions to … Continue reading
Posted in Practice and Procedure
Comments Off on One Defendant Not Liable to Pay Defaulting Defendant’s Settlement Contribution
“Insured v. Insured” Exclusion Doesn’t Apply to Claim by Insured’s Liquidator
Markham General Insurance Company was ordered wound up in July, 2002. The liquidator of Markham is now suing its former directors and officers, alleging that they negligently managed the company. Those defendants, in turn, had D & O coverage with … Continue reading
Posted in Duty to Defend, Exclusions, Insurance News
Comments Off on “Insured v. Insured” Exclusion Doesn’t Apply to Claim by Insured’s Liquidator
C.A. Rules $3.1 Million AB Settlement Enforceable Despite Claimant’s Death
The Court of Appeal ruled today, in Wu v. Zurich Insurance Company, that a $3.1 million settlement of an accident benefits claim was enforceable by the estate of the injured claimant, who died before the settlement had been approved by … Continue reading
Posted in Auto, Insurance News, Practice and Procedure
Comments Off on C.A. Rules $3.1 Million AB Settlement Enforceable Despite Claimant’s Death
Litigants Can’t Avoid Manual Search of Documents for Production
Air Canada et al. v. Westjet Airlines Ltd. et al. is evidently “the largest case of corporate espionage ever seen in Canada”. It will undoubtedly spawn many rulings as it proceeds through the courts and today’s is an interesting one. … Continue reading
Posted in Discovery, Practice and Procedure, Privilege
Comments Off on Litigants Can’t Avoid Manual Search of Documents for Production
Childs v. Desormeaux: A Post-Mortem
Last Friday night, Wiliams McEnery held a small reception for Eric Willams and Jaye Hooper. As most readers will know, Eric and Jaye were the winning counsel in Friday’s Supreme Court of Canada ruling in Childs v. Desormeaux, the “social … Continue reading
Posted in Tort News
Comments Off on Childs v. Desormeaux: A Post-Mortem